AOL... I Finally Got One Right!

It was January of 2000 and I was in my usual Tuesday morning breakfast group with my friends at Jim's.  We spent time talking about life, family and business.  My friends Matt and Shawn were far wiser than I when it came to business and technology (successful tech entrprenuer and Harvard MBA, respectively).  I was still learning the tech space and was just months away from co-founding my first tech company.  Despite my poor track record (I had recently bought stock in Pancho's Mexican Buffet.... don't laugh!) and lack of experience, I saw this disaster coming.

From the early days of the internet, I was there. (You may remember me as 635287874@prodigy.net)  I had an AOL account even before those CD's started showing up at the checkout line at 7-Eleven.  I didn't know much, but I did know that marrying a red hot new technology company with an old school media firm was a bad idea.  It couldn't work and it didn't work. When the AOL-Time Warner merger was announced in January 2000, the combined market capitalization was $280 billion. Today it is $28B.

So here we are, eight years and billions of dollars in lost shareholder value later.  Now what?  First of all, the spinout makes perfect sense.  It will allow Armstrong and the gang to attempt to rebuild a once proud company into something at least relevant.  It also positions AOL to be a new media company by finding creative ways to leverage the assets (audience) into profit.  I saw the plan and I think it makes sense...

Silicon Alley describes the heart of the plan as making AOL more "Google-y".  There is white space below Google.  They own a ridiculous share of the search market and someone will take away market share over the next few years.  Add to that that online advertising continues to grow while traditional media implodes and poof, you have a market opportunity.  AOL is uniquely positioned to play in this space if they fully leverage their assets including ADTECH, Platform A and others.

Remember when you went to America Online, errr... I mean AOL, to read content?  They have audience, content and connecting the dots means revenue growth.  I am pulling for them now, in 2000 I was not.  The strategy then was to try and retain the "walled garden" approach and milk dial up income for as long as possible.... bad idea.

Good luck Tim, you'll need it.  But you have a shot, and that puts you well ahead of your friends back in 2000.

Tom Cuthbert

The Buzz on Click Fraud

The New York Times ran a feature article this week on click fraud.  Why you ask?  Because, like spam, click fraud is still a big problem for advertisers. The article pointed out that as the economy tilts downward, advertisers cannot afford to waste dollars. This is a good news, bad news scenario for online advertising.

The good news is that online advertising is highly measurable.  Large advertisers that traditionally have been offline are now shifting dollars online.  This fact has contributed to online advertising continuing to grow as traditional media is in decline.

The bad news however, is that this window of opportunity is narrow.  The online advertising community must embrace measurability and enhance trust to gain share of spend from the big guys. 

There was a significant event this week that helped in that effort.  The Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) released from draft the Click Measurement Guidelines.  This document, three years in the making, is a great start for our community to come together around standards and enhance trust. Dozens of ad providers are busily working with third party audit firms to become accredited to the new guidelines.  Advertisers will have a way to gauge the level of commitment from ad provides when this list is made public.

Click Forensics was proud to represent advertisers in this process.  In fact, we were the only traffic quality management firm to participate and were quoted in the press release from the IAB.  Many thanks are in order for the 38 members of the working group for a job well done.

Now, we find ourselves at the beginning.  An opportunity exists to build on the foundation laid by the IAB member companies.  Click fraud is going to be a problem for a long time to come.  Progress is being made.  But in order to re-accelerate the growth of online advertising we need more than standards.  We need a community effort to work together to ensure advertisers have confidence that they get what they pay for.  Articles raise awareness, documents create a process and awareness builds urgency.  But ultimately it will take the effort of everyone in the community to get to the day where trust is commonplace and online advertising becomes the marvelous, measurable media it can be.  We look forward to continuing our efforts toward that goal.

Tom Cuthbert

Why the Wall St. Journal Rocks

Recently, I've been griping about my local paper and newspapers in general.  The industry is in turmoil and changing rapidly.  One big change will be the way the paper will be read in the future.  Today's announcement about the Kindle DX will make it easier for people like me to eventually switch to a digital reader.  I like this idea and I cannot imagine how newspapers today, in their current form, will survive, except for one...  the Wall St. Journal.

I have been an avid Journal reader for years.  The paper has changed for the better in recent years and is setting the pace for an industry in transition.  In fact, of all major newspapers in this country, the Wall St. Journal was the only one to INCREASE paid subscribers in the last month.  While an entire industry cuts content, moves online or folds all-together how can it be that the Journal grows?  

There have been several recent changes that I believe have enhanced the reading experience, broadened appeal and made the paper more useful.  That list includes:

• Added sports coverage


• Adjusted the physical size of the paper


• Enhanced the paid online version


• Launched an iPhone app


• Produce excellent podcasts and vidcasts


• Broadened appeal with health, tech and travel


• Reformatted the front page for easy scanning

But beyond these enhancements, fundamentally the I enjoy the Journal for three reasons.  First, the perspective is conservative yet thoughtful.  The OpEd page is engaging and thought provoking.  The editorial page in my local paper has become predictable and mundane.  Any column worth reading was syndicated from another paper.  There are essentially no independent thinkers or interesting writers.  While I don't always agree with Peggy Noonan, Kim Strassel or William McGurn, I do respect their perspective. 

Secondly, the information I read in the Journal or hear on their podcasts is relevant to me.  Walt Mossberg and Katie Boehret are consistently exceptional with product reviews and insights.  The company coverage is great and news stories are engaging.  From travel to tech and health to book and wine reviews, it fits my lifestyle.

Finally the Journal entertains me in an intelligent way.  Each day there is a story on the front page that delves into topics ranging from Bollywood to windmills.  I'm a sucker for Pepper and Salt, the funny cartoon (my recent favorite at left).  The writing style is accurate when needed and relaxed when appropriate.  I also find the podcast with Gordon Deal to be a great compliment to the paper.

So as newspaper executives across the country (and here in my hometown) are scratching their heads try to figure out why they are sinking, they should pick up a copy of the Journal.  I do... everyday.

Tom Cuthbert